Ryan Jacobs No Comments

Position Sizing: The Key to Properly Executing an Investment Strategy

Position sizing is a crucial aspect of successful investing. It involves determining the appropriate amount of capital to allocate to each investment in order to achieve sufficient risk management and maximize returns. In this article, we will explore the importance of position sizing and how it contributes to executing an investment strategy effectively.

The Role of Position Sizing

Position sizing is a key factor of investment strategy, serving as a tool for managing and mitigating various risks inherent in the market. By carefully allocating a specific percentage of your portfolio to each position, you can effectively reduce the impact of both company-specific and market-related risks. This approach not only safeguards your investments but also plays a pivotal role in maximizing returns. Oversizing a position may expose the portfolio to potential catastrophic losses, while under sizing can lead to the risk of subpar performance. Achieving the art of precision sizing entails finding the delicate balance that best suits your objectives, ultimately optimizing your portfolio’s returns.

Systemic Risk

Mitigating systemic risk, which encompasses market-wide or sector-specific vulnerabilities, involves prudent portfolio management strategies. One effective approach is to diversify your portfolio and limit each position to 20% of the total portfolio cost. This prudent allocation shields you from overexposure to any single company or industry, reducing the potential for substantial losses during market downturns or sector-wide crises while concurrently maximizing potential returns.

To further fortify your defenses against systemic risk, it is essential to consider the industries and sectors in which you invest. Given that systemic risk transcends individual companies and can affect entire sectors, it’s crucial to avoid excessive concentration in one area. For instance, an overly tech-heavy portfolio could be vulnerable to adverse events in the technology sector. Similarly, over-concentration in sectors like healthcare, energy, or financials carries its own risks. To safeguard against regional and exchange risk, diversify across different regions and industries, as well as individual businesses. This strategic diversification approach effectively manages systemic risk without the need for excessive over-diversification.

Temporal diversification, or averaging into positions, serves as a strategy to mitigate systemic risk. This patient method involves making a series of purchases over a defined period, capitalizing on the price fluctuations of shares. It’s a nuanced way of building into or out of positions, especially when dealing with less-liquid securities. For investors, mastering this approach is invaluable.

Maintaining price discipline is of utmost importance. Even when a company’s shares appear to be a bargain, they can experience significant price drops. If an investor identifies a promising opportunity yet has reservations—be it due to a lack of full conviction or limited tradable volume—it might make sense to spread out the investment. Instead of making a singular 20% purchase, the investor could opt for a series of four increments, each constituting 5% of the intended investment, spread out over time.

This phased approach allows for setting specific parameters. For instance, if the company achieves certain milestones, or if shares hit a predetermined price, it could trigger another 5% addition to the portfolio. The benefits of this strategy are twofold: an investor can average into a position that consistently meets expectations or acquire shares at progressively better prices if they continue to dip, maximizing the potential return on the same opportunity.

Company-Specific Risk

Having a portfolio with five unrelated positions can effectively mitigate company-specific risk. When your portfolio consists of multiple unrelated ideas or companies, it ensures that the negative developments in a single company, such as poor management decisions, regulatory issues, or financial instability, will have a limited impact on your overall portfolio.

With just five positions, the impact of each company on your portfolio’s performance is more significant than if you held many more positions with minimal allocations, such as 5% positions. This means that when you make correct assumptions about a specific situation within one of these five companies, it can have a substantial impact on your portfolio’s performance, potentially leading to significant gains.

A focused portfolio of five unrelated positions strikes a balance between diversification and impact. It allows you to spread your investments across different ideas, mitigating company-specific risks, while also ensuring that your correct assessments and actions have a more meaningful influence on your overall portfolio returns.

Investors occasionally grapple with a lack of conviction in their top investment choices. Additionally, the volatility of a concentrated portfolio might prove too taxing for some to endure year-to-year. One way to alleviate this is by adjusting the size of each investment within the portfolio.

For example, if we determine that 20% at-cost positions effectively influence portfolio performance while also containing the risk of severe losses, but the aim is to further dampen volatility, then cutting each at-cost investment to half of the initial percentage becomes a logical move. Holding ten positions, each at 10%, still results in a reasonably concentrated portfolio. If these positions are judiciously selected, this can help in reducing volatility.

However, one consequence of decreasing the concentration of each holding is the need to include more investments to complete the portfolio. As the number of required positions rises, the potency of each idea might diminish. Moreover, to make a significant impact on the overall portfolio’s performance, each position must appreciate considerably in value. This might tempt an investor to opt for riskier securities to counterbalance the diluted concentration.

It’s essential to understand that portfolio strategies aren’t always binary. A hybrid approach could be employed. For instance, allocating two or three 20% positions to your highest conviction ideas, while populating the remainder of the portfolio with 10% positions that hold promising potential, might offer a balanced blend of concentration and risk mitigation.

The Importance of Simplicity and Logic

An investment strategy must be simple, logical, and easy to execute. If a strategy is overly complex or lacks a clear rationale, it can be described as speculation rather than a sound investment approach. Position sizing is an integral part of a logical investment strategy, as it provides a structured framework for allocating capital.

Investment strategies that could expose an investor to a total loss on their portfolio are considered speculative. In reality, any financial instrument could become worthless suddenly due to the inherent structure of all financial markets. Rare but genuine scenarios, such as unforeseen fraud, regulatory clampdowns, or catastrophic events, could render even the most stable securities worthless. Thus, while the term “speculation” is not easily defined, it is recognizable: if a security or strategy could result in a total loss during its typical operation, it should be avoided.

Certain forms of speculation, which essentially involve making assumptions and predictions, are integral to investment analysis. They are also vital for business underwriting. Predicting various operational factors of a business based on past performance and confidence in future operations are logical exercises. Relying solely on zero-prediction analysis often leads investors to seek companies with the highest current yield or the most significant current discount to tangible value. While this might be an attractive strategy, especially for smaller investors seeking significant discounts, some of the best investments occur when assumptions are made about a currently profitable business. Confidence in these assumptions allows investors to commit for the long term. This approach mirrors business-like investment, where one remains a committed owner of shares because they recognize the shares’ current value and have confidence in their predictions based on the company’s track record.

Learning to make thoughtful predictions based on confidence in available data is a valuable skill for investors. What distinguishes investment analysis predictions from pure speculation is the potential damage speculation can inflict on a portfolio’s permanent integrity. For instance, if you’ve bought shares in a consistently performing company and made predictions about its future strategies, you might achieve above-market returns by holding onto that company for 3-5 years. If your assumptions don’t pan out, the worst-case scenario might be underperformance relative to peers and the general market index. However, you still have the opportunity to salvage value from your shares and reinvest elsewhere. By being consistent in your conservative predictions, any losses from incorrect assumptions remain recoverable.

In contrast, speculation is akin to walking a tightrope without a safety net. High-risk predictions seeking high rewards, using callable or floating leverage, buying overvalued shares dependent solely on growth, or making macroeconomic bets with disastrous potential outcomes should be avoided. Almost all financial transactions can be intelligently structured to include some form of price protection as a safety barrier. Committing to a logical and straightforward investment strategy, rather than a complex one, is the best way to minimize risk and maximize returns.

Executing an Investment Strategy

Executing an investment strategy effectively is crucial, and having a well-thought-out approach can offer protection against both company-specific risk and systemic market risk. One such strategy involves focusing on a portfolio with just five positions, which can provide a robust balance between diversification and impact.

With a portfolio of five positions, you can effectively manage company-specific risk. It’s an approach that allows you to stay agile and responsive while still minimizing exposure to any single company’s setbacks. This way, if one investment underperforms due to poor management decisions, regulatory issues, or financial instability, it won’t unduly affect your entire portfolio.

Moreover, the five-position strategy offers flexibility. You can employ a “basket” approach to create a 20% position within your portfolio. For example, if you have a collection of investment ideas that share a common theme or would all benefit from similar market conditions, you can allocate four 5% positions to collectively make up a 20% position in your portfolio. This approach allows you to retain the benefits of a concentrated portfolio while diversifying within the 20% allocation to capture potential market opportunities more effectively. This is similar to the portfolio of ten 10% positions described earlier. However, this approach groups a select number of positions under a similarly themed basket, which can be thought of as a collective position.

In essence, the five-position strategy combines the advantages of concentrated and diversified portfolios, offering a balanced and flexible way to execute your investment strategy while addressing both company-specific and systemic risks.

Conclusion

Position sizing is indeed a critical element of successful investing, and different strategies work for different investors. Let’s explore the concept of a five-position portfolio and its effectiveness in mitigating risk and potentially generating superior returns.

A five-position portfolio involves allocating a specific percentage of your investments to just five carefully chosen securities. This approach has several advantages:

  1. Risk Mitigation: Embracing a focused portfolio of five positions empowers you to closely monitor and deeply comprehend each investment, enhancing your ability to make well-informed decisions. While diversification across various asset classes is a widely used risk management strategy, a concentrated portfolio ensures that you can fully capitalize on high-conviction ideas. In such a scenario, if one position encounters a downturn, its impact remains proportionate, thereby allowing you to address and mitigate risks more directly, and potentially leading to a quicker and more strategic response to safeguard your overall portfolio.
  2. Superior Returns: By concentrating your investments in a few select positions, you have the opportunity to focus on high-conviction ideas that you believe will outperform the market. This can lead to potentially superior returns compared to a highly diversified portfolio that includes a multitude of average-performing assets.
  3. Simplicity and Ease of Execution: Managing a five-position portfolio is simpler and more manageable for most individual investors. It allows you to thoroughly research and stay up to date on each investment, making it easier to react to changing market conditions and news.

However, it’s important to note that a five-position portfolio can be more volatile than a portfolio with a larger number of positions, such as a fifty-position portfolio. This higher volatility is because a poor-performing asset has a more significant impact on the overall portfolio when there are fewer positions to offset losses. Therefore, this strategy may not be suitable for risk-averse investors who are excessively concerned about year-over-year volatility.

In such cases, a twenty-five-position portfolio might strike a balance between risk and diversification. However, it is typically more suitable for institutions with significant assets under management, like pension funds that have specific obligations coming due. For most individuals and institutions, a five-position portfolio is a practical choice.

It’s worth mentioning that famous value investors like Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger, who have enjoyed outstanding long-term performance, used a conviction driven approach in their early partnerships. Their success demonstrates the potential of a concentrated portfolio strategy.

Nevertheless, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach to portfolio sizing. Other renowned investors like Peter Lynch and Walter Schloss achieved exceptional records with more diversified portfolios. The key is to understand your risk tolerance, investment philosophy, and financial goals, and then align your portfolio size accordingly.

In conclusion, portfolio sizing is a highly individualized decision. Whether you choose a five-position portfolio for simplicity and potential superior returns or opt for more diversification, it should align with your investment strategy and comfort level. The experiences of famous investors show that success can be achieved through various approaches, but what matters most is understanding the psychological implications of your portfolio size and how it affects your ability to stay disciplined and benefit from long-term returns.

The information presented in this article is the opinion of Jacobs Investment Management and does not reflect the view of any other person or entity.  The information provided is believed to be from reliable sources, but no liability is accepted for any inaccuracies.  This is for information purposes and should not be construed as an investment recommendation.  Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. 

Ryan Jacobs No Comments

Mastering Leverage: Balancing Risks and Rewards in Finance

Leverage refers to the use of borrowed funds to amplify potential returns. It can be a powerful tool for businesses and investors alike, but it also comes with inherent risks. Mastering leverage requires a deep understanding of its mechanics and a careful balance between risks and rewards. In this article, we will explore the concept of leverage, its benefits and drawbacks, and strategies for effectively managing it in a portfolio or in a business.

Understanding Leverage

Leverage allows individuals and organizations to control a larger amount of assets with a smaller initial investment. By borrowing money to invest or operate, they can potentially increase their profits. This is achieved through the use of various financial instruments such as loans, credit lines, or derivatives.

For example, a company may use leverage to finance its expansion plans by taking on debt. By doing so, it can invest in new projects or acquire assets that have the potential to generate higher returns. Similarly, an investor may use leverage to amplify their gains in the stock market by purchasing stocks on margin.

Leverage is a double-edged sword; some market participants have astutely utilized it to significantly boost their returns, while others have been severely impacted by the harsh consequences of misusing it. Rather than categorizing leverage as simply “good” or “bad,” and something to be either embraced or avoided, it’s crucial to understand its nuances and the diverse ways it can be applied. Not all scenarios involving leverage are equal, and discerning how to safely utilize leverage can be a tremendous advantage for investors and business operators alike.

The Benefits of Leverage

When used judiciously, leverage offers multiple advantages. It can significantly increase potential returns by amplifying the capital invested, particularly in high-return scenarios. Leverage also enables individuals and businesses to tap into opportunities that would otherwise be inaccessible due to capital constraints, opening avenues to new markets and investments. Additionally, it provides enhanced flexibility and liquidity, allowing for more efficient resource allocation and the ability to capitalize on time-sensitive opportunities.

Industries such as banking, insurance, and real estate are deeply dependent on borrowed funds for their daily operations, a practice integral to their business models. In banking, this is evident as banks accept customer deposits, essentially short-term loans, and use them to make longer-term loans like mortgages and personal loans. The difference in interest between what banks pay for deposits and what they earn from loans is a key revenue source. Additionally, banks use leveraging through financial instruments to boost earnings. In the insurance sector, companies collect premiums, known as “float”, which act as borrowed funds for investment before claims are paid out. The success of these companies largely depends on the low cost of the float and the returns generated from investing it. Effective investment of this capital is crucial, as insurers need to balance the need for sufficient reserves to cover future claims while maximizing investment returns. Thus, the financial health of an insurance company hinges on its ability to manage both the cost of float and the income generated from it, making proficient fund management and risk assessment essential. The real estate industry’s connection with leverage is clear, as property purchases typically involve financing. Entities like REITs and developers often use substantial debt for acquisitions and projects, allowing for operations on a scale unattainable with only equity financing. However, this also renders them sensitive to interest rate fluctuations and credit market shifts. In all these sectors, leveraging is not just an occasional tool but a cornerstone of strategy, aiding in asset leveraging, operation expansion, and profit enhancement, albeit with the accompanying risks of financial volatility and market downturns, where borrowing costs might rise, or the value of loan-backed assets might fall. Therefore, these industries require robust risk management and a deep understanding of market dynamics.

Investors utilize leverage to take advantage of opportunities in an aggressive manner. Utilizing leverage to purchase undervalued stocks has been done successfully by investors before but it does not come without risk. When purchasing stocks on margin, an investor becomes exposed to the risk of a margin call. A margin call is a demand by a broker or lender for an investor to deposit additional money or securities into their account to bring the account balance up to the minimum maintenance margin. This situation occurs when the value of the securities in a margin account falls below a certain level, prompting the broker to request more funds to cover potential losses. This is to ensure that the account has sufficient collateral to maintain the positions held using borrowed funds. Failure to meet a margin call can result in the broker selling securities in the account to cover the shortfall. This exposes the investor to far greater risk of downward volatility then normally evident in stock investing.

Warren Buffett’s investment in Japanese companies is a notable example of smart use of leverage. In 2020, Berkshire Hathaway, disclosed acquiring around 5% stakes in five major Japanese trading houses – Itochu, Marubeni, Mitsubishi, Mitsui, and Sumitomo. Later, these stakes were increased to approximately 7.4%. The investment demonstrated Buffett’s strategy of identifying and investing in undervalued companies in established industries, particularly those poised for long-term growth.

A key aspect of this investment strategy was the issuance of yen-denominated bonds by Berkshire Hathaway. In 2023, Berkshire Hathaway sold yen bonds at lower costs in its second Japan deal of the year, raising ¥122 billion (about $810 million) through a variety of notes ranging from three years to 35 years. This bond issuance was strategically done at a time when the market conditions were favorable, allowing Berkshire to reduce spreads compared to its previous sale. The issuance of these bonds is a clear example of leveraging debt to finance investments. By raising capital through bond issuance, Buffett was able to invest in Japanese equities, thus leveraging his investment potential while maintaining a cost-effective approach to funding.

This approach highlights the strategic use of leverage in investments. By issuing bonds, Berkshire Hathaway raised capital at a lower cost, which was then invested in undervalued Japanese stocks, demonstrating Buffett’s confidence in their growth potential. This method of using leverage is effective as it allows for raising substantial capital while keeping the costs relatively low, thus maximizing the potential returns from the investments.

Buffett’s investment in Japan and the associated use of leverage through bond issuance underscore the potential benefits of leveraging debt in a calculated and strategic manner, especially when investing in undervalued assets with strong growth prospects.

The Risks of Leverage

While leverage can offer considerable advantages, it’s crucial to be mindful of its associated risks. Firstly, leverage magnifies both gains and losses, meaning small shifts in asset value can significantly impact leveraged positions, potentially leading to substantial losses. Secondly, borrowing incurs costs such as interest rates and financing charges, which can diminish profits and add to the expense of leveraging. Lastly, leverage imposes extra financial obligations, including debt repayments; failing to meet these can result in severe financial distress or even bankruptcy.

Overconfidence can be a detrimental trait for investors and business operators utilizing leverage. It is especially dangerous when incorporating leverage into growth or momentum investing, because of the often-high valuations that come with growth-oriented firms, any deviations in predicted performance can cause large decreases in value, thus triggering a margin call. Leverage also leaves little room for error, as wrong decisions become magnified by the borrowed funds.

Leverage significantly exposes investors and businesses to a variety of macroeconomic risks, which can be particularly impactful in volatile economic environments. One of the key risks is interest rate risk. This occurs when interest rates rise, increasing the cost of borrowing. For those using leverage, this means higher interest payments, which can erode profits or exacerbate losses, especially if the investment itself isn’t performing well.

Another critical risk is related to changes in the yield curve, particularly when it inverts. An inverted yield curve, where long-term debt instruments have a lower yield than short-term debt instruments, is often seen as a predictor of economic recession. For leveraged positions, this can signal decreasing investor confidence and potential downturns in asset values, thereby increasing the risk of losses.

Furthermore, credit crunches pose a significant risk. During a credit crunch, lenders tighten their lending criteria, making it more difficult and expensive to borrow money. This can be particularly problematic for those relying on leverage, as it could lead to either a sudden unavailability of credit or increased costs of maintaining leveraged positions. In extreme cases, a credit crunch can force investors to liquidate their positions at unfavorable prices, leading to substantial losses.

Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) is a prime example of how overconfidence and excessive leverage can lead to catastrophic results, even for highly intelligent and experienced investors. Founded by Nobel Prize-winning economists and renowned Wall Street traders, LTCM was initially successful, leveraging its sophisticated financial models to earn substantial returns.

LTCM’s investment strategy heavily relied on arbitrage opportunities in bond markets. They believed these opportunities were low-risk and highly predictable, supported by their complex mathematical models. To capitalize on these small profit margins, LTCM used enormous leverage — at one point, the firm’s leverage ratio was estimated to be as high as 25 to 30 times its capital.

However, the Russian financial crisis in 1998 triggered a series of unexpected market movements. The crisis led to increased market volatility and a flight to liquidity, which drastically affected the pricing of the securities LTCM had heavily invested in. The firm’s strategies, designed under the assumption of normal market conditions, were ill-equipped to handle such unprecedented events.

The massive leverage employed by LTCM magnified these losses to a catastrophic scale. The firm’s capital base was quickly eroded, leading to a severe liquidity crisis. The situation was so dire that it threatened to destabilize the entire global financial system. Eventually, a consortium of major financial institutions, facilitated by the Federal Reserve, had to intervene with a bailout to prevent a broader market collapse.

The downfall of LTCM serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of overconfidence and overleveraging. It highlights that even strategies deemed low-risk and backed by sophisticated models can lead to disaster when market conditions change rapidly and unpredictably. This event underscored the importance of considering extreme scenarios and maintaining a prudent level of leverage, especially when dealing with complex financial instruments.

Strategies for Managing Leverage

To effectively manage leverage and mitigate associated risks, it is crucial to employ a comprehensive approach that encompasses various strategies and recognizes the diversity of leverage types, such as fixed rate, floating rate, margin, and others. Each form of debt has its nuances, making it vital to understand these specifics before committing to any financial obligations.

Starting with a thorough risk assessment is essential. This step involves a deep dive into the potential risks tied to the investment or project, while also evaluating your tolerance for these risks. Understanding the nature and extent of what you’re getting into sets a solid foundation for leveraging.

Diversification plays a critical role in this equation. By spreading investments across different asset classes, you reduce the impact of volatility. This strategy acts as a buffer, balancing out losses in one area with gains in another, thereby providing a more stable financial position.

Continuous monitoring and control of your leveraged positions are crucial. This involves keeping a keen eye on market conditions and being agile enough to modify your strategies as necessary. It’s about staying informed and responsive to the ever-changing financial landscape.

Stress testing is another important tactic. This entails simulating various market scenarios to gauge how adverse conditions could impact your leveraged positions. Such testing can uncover potential weaknesses, allowing for proactive measures to be taken to strengthen your financial stance.

Having sufficient cash reserves is also vital when employing leverage. Cash acts as a safety net, protecting you from issues like margin calls for investors or a shortfall in operational income for operators. It provides a cushion, offering financial flexibility and security.

The psychological aspect cannot be overlooked. It’s important to be aware of and avoid pitfalls like overconfidence, herd mentality, and getting swept up in speculative or overvalued ventures. A level-headed, well-informed approach is key to successful leverage management.

Finally, seeking professional advice is highly recommended. Financial experts specializing in leverage and risk management can offer invaluable insights and help devise a strategy that aligns with your goals and risk appetite. They can also assist in finding creative ways to utilize debt and structuring it effectively to maximize rewards. Their guidance can be the difference between a successful leverage strategy and a problematic one.

Conclusion

Leverage is indeed a double-edged sword in the financial world. On one side, it offers the enticing possibility of amplified returns and opens the door to new investment opportunities that might otherwise be inaccessible. On the other, it comes with substantial risks, including the potential for significant losses. Mastering the use of leverage is about striking a delicate balance between these risks and rewards. This mastery isn’t just about understanding leverage’s technicalities; it’s also about comprehensively grasping its practical applications in various scenarios.

It is crucial to recognize the different ways leverage can be utilized and the contexts in which it becomes a valuable tool. One part of this learning process involves examining real-world cases where leverage played a pivotal role, both positively and negatively. For instance, studying Warren Buffett’s Japan trade provides insights into strategic leverage use in expanding market opportunities. Conversely, understanding the downfall of Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) offers a stark lesson in the dangers of excessive and poorly managed leverage. These stories are not just historical footnotes; they are vital learning tools that illustrate the complex dynamics of leverage in the financial world.

Furthermore, it is important to follow sound risk management practices, which include regular risk assessments, diversification, vigilant monitoring and control, and stress testing. These practices help in identifying and mitigating potential risks associated with leveraging. Additionally, keeping ample cash reserves provides a safety net against unforeseen financial strains.

In summary, leveraging is a powerful financial strategy that, when used wisely, can lead to substantial gains. However, it requires a deep understanding of its mechanisms, an awareness of its historical applications and outcomes, and a commitment to rigorous risk management. With these tools and knowledge, individuals and businesses can navigate the world of leverage confidently and maximize their chances of success.

The information presented in this article is the opinion of Jacobs Investment Management and does not reflect the view of any other person or entity.  The information provided is believed to be from reliable sources, but no liability is accepted for any inaccuracies.  This is for information purposes and should not be construed as an investment recommendation.  Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.